111122
A movie that surpasses most of the contemporaries of its genre, Martyrs not only has the staple elements of a horror flick but also exudes depth and careful thinking from the director and also its intended audience. I delved right into the film not expecting to gain anything from it but a few shivers and 94 minutes of short-lived entertainment but it has proven to be the kind of film that takes a longer digestion and rumination period. It is a gory and unusual exploration of revenge, torture, cruelty, and exploitation of human suffering.
A young girl, Lucie (Mylène Jampanoï), ends up in an orphanage after escaping an unknown warehouse where she was being held captive and tortured. The only person she would talk to was Anna (Morjana Alaoui) and they develop a friendship. Naturally, Lucie suffers extreme PTSD that manifests in the form of a girl who she perceived as a monster who hurts her. Later, it was revealed that as Lucie was running out of the warehouse, she stumbled upon another girl shackled to the floor begging for help but in an act of self-preservation, Lucie fled. For years, she is still haunted by her past and ultimately seeks revenge on the people responsible for her pain and suffering. Anna then comes to help her bury the bodies. These scenes are truly cringe-worthy as Lucie mercilessly shoots a man, a woman, and their innocent children in their suburban home without letting them say a word.
“A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser,” Edgar Allan Poe wrote in his short story The Cask of Amontillado which can be comparable to Lucie’s situation. What Lucie abruptly realized was that after revenge was exacted, her guilt and her sorrow in the form of the ghost is still with her, still hurting her and so in a vile act she takes a razor and slashes her own throat. Anna investigates a little and finds a dimly lit underground corridor plastered with foul images of individuals being tortured. There, she finds a girl in chains and weird metal contraptions on her head and hips. I was surprised by Anna’s calm demeanor as she tries to help the badly scarred and emaciated girl and found it a nice moment in the bathtub when she held the hands of the girl whose vision was impaired by the metal blindfold. It seemed like an homage to Anna’s friendship with Lucie and as she held hands with the girl, she was remembering what it was like when Lucie was the one suffering and how much she loved and cared for her friend.
The girl tries to cut her wrists and bangs her head against the wall and Anna tries to save her but she was interrupted by a group of people who comes into the house, shoots the girl dead, and takes Anna underground. In this act of the movie, a woman referred to as Mademoiselle sheds light on why the movie was aptly called so. As it turns out, they are a society who takes people and puts them through different stages of torture in hopes that they will undergo transcendence into the afterlife. There are victims and there are martyrs. “People ignore the existence of suffering. That’s how the world sees it. Yet, everyone’s a victim.” Lucie was not able to use her pain to go beyond this world and became a victim like the rest. To them, martyrs “withstand paralyzing pain and can survive total deprivation…” The true sacrifice of martyrdom is this: it is carrying all the sins of the world and transcending themselves completely.
In the final part of the film, Anna becomes the next subject of the society’s macabre beliefs and practices. She is chained, her head is shaved, her body physically abused over and over. She is broken down, slowly, methodically, systematically, coldly. A more visceral facet of the film is shown with the close-up of Anna’s battered face as she imagines a conversation with Lucie. Lucie tells her to let go so she wouldn’t be afraid anymore. Anna turns completely docile to her abusers and shows no fear when the society has decided she is ready to move on to the fourth and final stage of her martyrdom. I think it is a popular opinion when I say that this is the most disturbing and horrifying part of the film when Anna is flayed alive, only the skin on her face remaining. Anna then appears to have reached transcendence and shares with Mademoiselle what she has seen in her vision. What is more horrifying is how far the society is willing to go to exploit human suffering just to get insights on the afterlife.
It is left to the interpretation of the audience whether Anna has truly reached transcendence and become a martyr by the society’s standards. To them, a martyr is a witness. When Mademoiselle shoots herself, I was only left to wonder: did she do so in an act of seeing the afterlife for herself? Or was she not satisfied with Anna’s insights in her brief transcendence?
In the DVD version, Pascal Laugier said of his film: “I’m not sure you have made the right decision.” The word for Martyrs is intense. It is dark and evil and it showcases extreme brutality humans would put themselves and each other through in order to go beyond the norms of society. Although, I very much enjoyed it and regard it as one of the best horror movies of the 21st century and would gladly recommend it, I would not expose myself to such a heavy and sinister translation of what humans are truly capable of. At least not very soon. I am still recovering from it.